도전:

입력 : $[1, \text{list-size}]$ 범위 내의 고유 양수 목록입니다 .

출력 : 정수 : 목록이 리플-셔플 된 횟수 . 목록의 경우, 목록이 두 부분으로 분할되고이 부분이 인터리브됨을 의미합니다 (즉, 목록을 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]한 번 작성 하면 셔플 셔플 이 발생 하므로이 [1,6,2,7,3,8,4,9,5,10]문제의 경우 입력 [1,6,2,7,3,8,4,9,5,10]결과는 1).

도전 규칙 :

• 목록에 $[1, \text{list-size}]$ 범위의 양의 정수만 포함한다고 가정 할 수 있습니다 (또는 0 색인화 된 입력 목록을 선택하는 경우 $[0, \text{list-size}-1]$ ).
• 모든 입력 목록이 유효한 리플 셔플 목록이거나 셔플되지 않은 정렬 된 목록 (이 경우 출력이 0) 이라고 가정 할 수 있습니다 .
• 입력 목록에 3 개 이상의 값이 포함되어 있다고 가정 할 수 있습니다.

단계별 예 :

입력: [1,3,5,7,9,2,4,6,8]

한 번 셔플 해제하면 다음과 같이됩니다. 0 인덱스 항목도 모두 [1,5,9,4,8,3,7,2,6]먼저 나오고 [1, ,5, ,9, ,4, ,8]그 다음에 홀수 0 인덱스 항목이 있기 때문 입니다 [ ,3, ,7, ,2, ,6, ].
이 목록은 아직 주문되지 않았으므로 계속 진행하십시오.

목록을 다시 섞으면 다음과 같이 됩니다. [1,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2]
다시 : [1,8,6,4,2,9,7,5,3]
다음과 같이하십시오. [1,6,2,7,3,8,4,9,5]
그리고 마지막으로 : [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]순서가 지정된 목록이므로 셔플 링을 해제했습니다.

에 도달하기 위해 원본을 [1,3,5,7,9,2,4,6,8]5 번 셔플 링하지 않았으므로이 경우 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]출력이 5됩니다.

일반적인 규칙:

• 이것은 code-golf 이므로 바이트 단위의 최단 답변이 이깁니다.
  코드 골프 언어가 코드 골프 언어 이외의 언어로 답변을 게시하지 못하게하십시오. '모든'프로그래밍 언어에 대한 가능한 한 짧은 대답을 생각해보십시오.
• 표준 규칙 은 기본 I / O 규칙으로 답변에 적용 되므로 STDIN / STDOUT, 적절한 매개 변수 및 반환 유형의 전체 프로그램과 함께 함수 / 방법을 사용할 수 있습니다. 당신의 전화.
• 기본 허점 은 금지되어 있습니다.
• 가능하면 코드 테스트와 링크를 추가하십시오 (예 : TIO ).
• 또한 답변에 대한 설명을 추가하는 것이 좋습니다.

테스트 사례 :

Input                                                   Output

[1,2,3]                                                 0
[1,2,3,4,5]                                             0
[1,3,2]                                                 1
[1,6,2,7,3,8,4,9,5,10]                                  1
[1,3,5,7,2,4,6]                                         2
[1,8,6,4,2,9,7,5,3,10]                                  2
[1,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,10]                                  3
[1,5,9,4,8,3,7,2,6,10]                                  4
[1,3,5,7,9,2,4,6,8]                                     5
[1,6,11,5,10,4,9,3,8,2,7]                               6
[1,10,19,9,18,8,17,7,16,6,15,5,14,4,13,3,12,2,11,20]    10
[1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20]    17
[1,141,32,172,63,203,94,234,125,16,156,47,187,78,218,109,249,140,31,171,62,202,93,233,124,15,155,46,186,77,217,108,248,139,30,170,61,201,92,232,123,14,154,45,185,76,216,107,247,138,29,169,60,200,91,231,122,13,153,44,184,75,215,106,246,137,28,168,59,199,90,230,121,12,152,43,183,74,214,105,245,136,27,167,58,198,89,229,120,11,151,42,182,73,213,104,244,135,26,166,57,197,88,228,119,10,150,41,181,72,212,103,243,134,25,165,56,196,87,227,118,9,149,40,180,71,211,102,242,133,24,164,55,195,86,226,117,8,148,39,179,70,210,101,241,132,23,163,54,194,85,225,116,7,147,38,178,69,209,100,240,131,22,162,53,193,84,224,115,6,146,37,177,68,208,99,239,130,21,161,52,192,83,223,114,5,145,36,176,67,207,98,238,129,20,160,51,191,82,222,113,4,144,35,175,66,206,97,237,128,19,159,50,190,81,221,112,3,143,34,174,65,205,96,236,127,18,158,49,189,80,220,111,2,142,33,173,64,204,95,235,126,17,157,48,188,79,219,110,250]
                                                        45

Jelly, 8 bytes

ŒœẎ$ƬiṢ’

Try it online!

How?

ŒœẎ$ƬiṢ’ - Link: list of integers A
    Ƭ    - collect up until results are no longer unique...
   $     -   last two links as a monad:
Œœ       -     odds & evens i.e. [a,b,c,d,...] -> [[a,c,...],[b,d,...]]
  Ẏ      -     tighten                         -> [a,c,...,b,d,...]
     Ṣ   - sort A
    i    - first (1-indexed) index of sorted A in collected shuffles
      ’  - decrement

JavaScript (ES6), 44 bytes

Shorter version suggested by @nwellnhof

Expects a deck with 1-indexed cards as input.

f=(a,x=1)=>a[x]-2&&1+f(a,x*2%(a.length-1|1))

Try it online!

Given a deck $[c_0,\ldots,c_{L-1}]$ of length $L$, we define:

And we look for $n$ such that $c_{x_n}=2$.

JavaScript (ES6),  57 52  50 bytes

Expects a deck with 0-indexed cards as input.

f=(a,x=1,k=a.length-1|1)=>a[1]-x%k&&1+f(a,x*-~k/2)

Try it online!

How?

Since JS is lacking native support for extracting array slices with a custom stepping, simulating the entire riffle-shuffle would probably be rather costly (but to be honest, I didn't even try). However, the solution can also be found by just looking at the 2nd card and the total number of cards in the deck.

Given a deck of length $L$, this code looks for $n$ such that:

where $c_2$ is the second card and $k$ is defined as:

Python 2, 39 bytes

f=lambda x:x[1]-2and-~f(x[::2]+x[1::2])

Try it online!

-4 thanks to Jonathan Allan.

R, 58 55 45 bytes

a=scan();while(a[2]>2)a=matrix(a,,2,F<-F+1);F

Try it online!

Simulates the sorting process. Input is 1-indexed, returns FALSE for 0.

Perl 6, 34 32 bytes

-2 bytes thanks to Jo King

{(.[(2 X**^$_)X%$_-1+|1]...2)-1}

Try it online!

Similar to Arnauld's approach. The index of the second card after n shuffles is 2**n % k with k defined as in Arnauld's answer.

APL (Dyalog Unicode), 35 26 23 22 bytes^SBCS

{⍵≡⍳≢⍵:0⋄1+∇⍵[⍒2|⍳⍴⍵]}

Try it online!

Thanks to Adám for the help, Erik the Outgolfer for -3 and ngn for -1.

The TIO link contains two test cases.

Explanation:

{⍵≡⍳≢⍵:0⋄1+∇⍵[⍒2|⍳⍴⍵]}
{⍵≡⍳≢⍵:0⋄1+∇⍵[⍒2|⍳⍴⍵]} ⍝ function takes one argument: ⍵, the array
 ⍵≡⍳≢⍵                 ⍝ if the array is sorted:
 ⍵≡⍳≢⍵                 ⍝ array = 1..length(array)
      :0               ⍝ then return 0
        ⋄              ⍝ otherwise
         1+            ⍝ increment
           ∇           ⍝ the value of the recursive call with this argument:
            ⍵[      ]  ⍝ index into the argument with these indexes:
                 ⍳⍴⍵   ⍝ - generate a range from 1 up to the size of ⍵
               2|      ⍝ - %2: generate a binary mask like [1 0 1 0 1 0]
              ⍒        ⍝ - grade (sorts but returns indexes instead of values), so we have the indexes of all the 1s first, then the 0s.

¹

Perl 6, 36 34 32 bytes

-2 bytes thanks to nwellnhof

$!={.[1]-2&&$!(.sort:{$++%2})+1}

Try it online!

Reverse riffle shuffles by sorting by the index modulo 2 until the list is sorted, then returns the length of the sequence.

It's funny, I don't usually try the recursive approach for Perl 6, but this time it ended up shorter than the original.

Explanation:

$!={.[1]-2&&$!(.sort:{$++%2})+1}
$!={                           }   # Assign the anonymous code block to $!
    .[1]-2&&                       # While the list is not sorted
            $!(             )      # Recursively call the function on
               .sort:{$++%2}       # It sorted by the parity of each index
                             +1    # And return the number of shuffles

05AB1E (legacy), 9 bytes

[DāQ#ι˜]N

Try it online!

Explanation

[   #  ]     # loop until
  ā          # the 1-indexed enumeration of the current list
 D Q         # equals a copy of the current list
     ι˜      # while false, uninterleave the current list and flatten
        N    # push the iteration index N as output

Java (JDK), 59 bytes

a->{int c=0;for(;a[(1<<c)%(a.length-1|1)]>2;)c++;return c;}

Try it online!

Works reliably only for arrays with a size less than 31 or solutions with less than 31 iterations. For a more general solution, see the following solution with 63 bytes:

a->{int i=1,c=0;for(;a[i]>2;c++)i=i*2%(a.length-1|1);return c;}

Try it online!

Explanation

In a riffle, the next position is the previous one times two modulo either length if it's odd or length - 1 if it's even.

So I'm iterating over all indices using this formula until I find the value 2 in the array.

Credits

• -8 bytes thanks to Kevin Cruijssen. (Previous algorithm, using array)
• -5 bytes thanks to Arnauld.

J, 28 26 bytes

-2 bytes thanks to Jonah!

 1#@}.(\:2|#\)^:(2<1{])^:a:

Try it online!

Inspired be Ven's APL solution.

Explanation:

               ^:       ^:a:   while 
                 (2<1{])       the 1-st (zero-indexed) element is greater than 2   
     (        )                do the following and keep the intermediate results
          i.@#                 make a list form 0 to len-1
        2|                     find modulo 2 of each element
      /:                       sort the argument according the list of 0's and 1's
1  }.                          drop the first row of the result
 #@                            and take the length (how many rows -> steps)     

K (ngn/k), 25 bytes

Thanks to ngn for the advice and for his K interpreter!

{#1_{~2=x@1}{x@<2!!#x}\x}

Try it online!

APL(NARS), chars 49, bytes 98

{0{∧/¯1↓⍵≤1⌽⍵:⍺⋄(⍺+1)∇⍵[d],⍵[i∼d←↑¨i⊂⍨2∣i←⍳≢⍵]}⍵}

why use in the deepest loop, one algo that should be nlog(n), when we can use one linear n? just for few bytes more? [⍵≡⍵[⍋⍵] O(nlog n) and the confront each element for see are in order using ∧/¯1↓⍵≤1⌽⍵ O(n)]test:

  f←{0{∧/¯1↓⍵≤1⌽⍵:⍺⋄(⍺+1)∇⍵[d],⍵[i∼d←↑¨i⊂⍨2∣i←⍳≢⍵]}⍵}
  f ,1
0
  f 1 2 3
0
  f 1,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,10
3
  f 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20
17

Ruby, 42 bytes

f=->d,r=1{d[r]<3?0:1+f[d,r*2%(1|~-d.max)]}

Try it online!

How:

Search for number 2 inside the array: if it's in second position, the deck hasn't been shuffled, otherwise check the positions where successive shuffles would put it.

R, 70 72 bytes

x=scan();i=0;while(any(x>sort(x))){x=c(x[y<-seq(x)%%2>0],x[!y]);i=i+1};i

Try it online!

Now handles the zero shuffle case.

C (GCC) 64 63 bytes

-1 byte from nwellnhof

i,r;f(c,v)int*v;{for(i=r=1;v[i]>2;++r)i=i*2%(c-1|1);return~-r;}

This is a drastically shorter answer based on Arnauld's and Olivier Grégoire's answers. I'll leave my old solution below since it solves the slightly more general problem of decks with cards that are not contiguous.

Try it online

C (GCC) 162 bytes

a[999],b[999],i,r,o;f(c,v)int*v;{for(r=0;o=1;++r){for(i=c;i--;(i&1?b:a)[i/2]=v[i])o=(v[i]>v[i-1]|!i)&o;if(o)return r;for(i+=o=c+1;i--;)v[i]=i<o/2?a[i]:b[i-o/2];}}

Try it online

a[999],b[999],i,r,o; //pre-declare variables
f(c,v)int*v;{ //argument list
    for(r=0;o=1;++r){ //major loop, reset o (ordered) to true at beginning, increment number of shuffles at end
        for(i=c;i--;(i&1?b:a)[i/2]=v[i]) //loop through v, split into halves a/b as we go
            o=(v[i]>v[i-1]|!i)&o; //if out of order set o (ordered) to false
        if(o) //if ordered
            return r; //return number of shuffles
        //note that i==-1 at this point
        for(i+=o=c+1;i--;)//set i=c and o=c+1, loop through v
            v[i]=i<o/2?a[i]:b[i-o/2];//set first half of v to a, second half to b
    }
}

R, 85 bytes

s=scan();u=sort(s);k=0;while(any(u[seq(s)]!=s)){k=k+1;u=as.vector(t(matrix(u,,2)))};k

Try it online.

Explanation

Stupid (brute force) method, much less elegant than following the card #2.

Instead of unshuffling the input s we start with a sorted vector u that we progressively shuffle until it is identical with s. This gives warnings (but shuffle counts are still correct) for odd lengths of input due to folding an odd-length vector into a 2-column matrix; in that case, in R, missing data point is filled by recycling of the first element of input.

The loop will never terminate if we provide a vector that cannot be unshuffled.

Addendum: you save one byte if unshuffling instead. Unlike the answer above, there is no need to transpose with t(), however, ordering is byrow=TRUE which is why T appears in matrix().

R, 84 bytes

s=scan();u=sort(s);k=0;while(any(s[seq(u)]!=u)){k=k+1;s=as.vector(matrix(s,,2,T))};k

Try it online!

PowerShell, 116 114 108 84 78 bytes

-24 bytes thanks to Erik the Outgolfer's solution.

-6 bytes thanks to mazzy.

param($a)for(;$a[1]-2){$n++;$t=@{};$a|%{$t[$j++%2]+=,$_};$a=$t.0+$t.1;$j=0}+$n

Try it online!

Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 62 bytes

c=0;While[Sort[a]!=a,a=a[[1;;-1;;2]]~Join~a[[2;;-1;;2]];c++];c

Try it online!

Explanation

The input list is a . It is unriffled and compared with the sorted list until they match.

Red, 87 79 78 bytes

func[b][c: 0 while[b/2 > 2][c: c + 1 b: append extract b 2 extract next b 2]c]

Try it online!

Perl 5 -pa, 77 bytes

map{push@{$_%2},$_}0..$#F;$_=0;++$_,@s=sort{$a-$b}@F=@F[@0,@1]while"@F"ne"@s"

Try it online!

Pyth, 18 bytes

L?SIb0hys%L2>Bb1
y

Try it online!

-2 thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer.

The script has two line: the first one defines a function y, the second line calls y with the implicit Q (evaluated stdin) argument.

L?SIb0hys%L2>Bb1
L                function y(b)
 ?               if...
  SIb            the Invariant b == sort(b) holds
     0           return 0
      h          otherwise increment...
       y         ...the return of a recursive call with:
             B   the current argument "bifurcated", an array of:
              b   - the original argument
            >  1  - same with the head popped off
          L      map...
         % 2     ...take only every 2nd value in each array
        s         and concat them back together

¹

PowerShell, 62 71 70 66 bytes

+9 bytes when Test cases with an even number of elements added.

-1 byte with splatting.

-4 bytes: wrap the expression with $i,$j to a new scope.

for($a=$args;$a[1]-2;$a=&{($a|?{++$j%2})+($a|?{$i++%2})}){$n++}+$n

Try it online!

Japt, 13 11 10 bytes

Taking my shiny, new, very-work-in-progress interpreter for a test drive.

ÅÎÍ©ÒßUñÏu

Try it or run all test cases

ÅÎÍ©ÒßUñÏu     :Implicit input of integer array U
Å              :Slice the first element off U
 Î             :Get the first element
  Í            :Subtract from 2
   ©           :Logical AND with
    Ò          :  Negation of bitwise NOT of
     ß         :  A recursive call to the programme with input
      Uñ       :    U sorted
        Ï      :    By 0-based indices
         u     :    Modulo 2

Python 3, 40 bytes

f=lambda x:x[1]-2and 1+f(x[::2]+x[1::2])  # 1-based
f=lambda x:x[1]-1and 1+f(x[::2]+x[1::2])  # 0-based

Try it online!

I need to refresh the page more frequently: missed Erik the Outgolfer's edit doing a similar trick =)