두 개의 독립적 인 랜덤 변수, 정규 및 카이-제곱의 곱의 pdf


17

X와 Y가 독립적이라면 두 개의 독립적 인 랜덤 변수 X와 Y의 곱의 pdf는 무엇입니까? X는 정규 분포이고 Y는 카이 제곱 분포입니다.

Z = XY

에 정규 분포가있는 경우 f X ( x ) = 1X

XN(μx,σx2)
fX(x)=1σx2πe12(xμxσx)2
Yk자유도를 갖는 카이 제곱 분포를가짐 whre단위 계단 함수이다.
Yχk2
fY(y)=y(k/2)1ey/22k/2Γ(k2)u(y)
u(y)

이제 의 PDF는 무엇입니까Z if X and Y are independent?

One way to find the solution is to use Rohatgi's well known result (1976,p.141) if fXY(x,y) be the joint pdf of continuous RV's X and Y, the pdf of Z is

fZ(z)=1|y|fXY(zy,y)dy

since, X and Y are independent fXY(x,y)=fX(x)fY(y)

fZ(z)=1|y|fX(zy)fY(y)dy
fZ(z)=1σx2π12k/2Γ(k2)01|y|e12(zyμxσx)2y(k/2)1ey/2dy
Where we face the problem of solving the integral 01|y|e12(zyμxσx)2y(k/2)1ey/2dy. Can anyone help me with this problem.

is there any alternative way to solve this?


2
That last step does not look quite right. "fXY" appears to mean fX, but--more importantly--you cannot just change the lower limit to 0: you need to break the integral into two separate ones at 0, change yy for the one in the negative range, and then combine the two. I believe this may make the integration tractable: it appears to give a linear combination of generalized hypergeometric functions.
whuber

Yes, that was a mistake fZY(zy) should be fX(zy).
robin

But i guess changing the lower limit to 0 is valid because fY(y) is a function on (0,) which is indicated by the unit step function u(y).
robin

I am no longer trained to this kind of computations... but it doesn’t look like it is possible to end up with a closed formula. If you need this for a practical application, I think you should focus on "how to compute this efficiently".
Elvis

4
Is there any motivation for this question? A Normal divided by a χ is a Student's t, but why would you consider a Normal multiplied or divided by a χ2?
Xi'an

답변:


1

simplify the term in the integral to

T=e12((zyμxσx)2y)yk/22

find the polynomial p(y) such that

[p(y)e12((zyμxσx)2y)]=p(y)e12((zyμxσx)2y)+p(y)[12((zyμxσx)2y)]e12((zyμxσx)2y)=T

which reduces to finding p(y) such that

p(y)+p(y)[12((zyμxσx)2y)]=yk/22

or

p(y)12p(y)(zμxσx2y2z2σx2y31)=yk/22

which can be done evaluating all powers of y seperately


edit after comments

Above solution won't work as it diverges.

Yet, some others have worked on this type of product.

Using Fourrier transform:

Schoenecker, Steven, and Tod Luginbuhl. "Characteristic Functions of the Product of Two Gaussian Random Variables and the Product of a Gaussian and a Gamma Random Variable." IEEE Signal Processing Letters 23.5 (2016): 644-647. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7425177/#full-text-section

For the product Z=XY with XN(0,1) and YΓ(α,β) they obtained the characteristic function:

φZ=1βα|t|αexp(14β2t2)Dα(1β|t|)

with Dα Whittaker's function ( http://people.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/page_686.htm )

Using Mellin transform:

Springer and Thomson have described more generally the evaluation of products of beta, gamma and Gaussian distributed random variables.

Springer, M. D., and W. E. Thompson. "The distribution of products of beta, gamma and Gaussian random variables." SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 18.4 (1970): 721-737. http://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/0118065

They use the Mellin integral transform. The Mellin transform of Z is the product of the Mellin transforms of X and Y (see http://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/0118065 or https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoms/1177730201). In the studied cases of products the reverse transform of this product can be expressed as a Meijer G-function for which they also provide and prove computational methods.

They did not analyze the product of a Gaussian and gamma distributed variable, although you might be able to use the same techniques. If I try to do this quickly then I believe it should be possible to obtain an H-function (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_H-function ) although I do not directly see the possibility to get a G-function or make other simplifications.

M{fY(x)|s}=2s1Γ(12k+s1)/Γ(12k)

and

M{fX(x)|s}=1π2(s1)/2σs1Γ(s/2)

you get

M{fZ(x)|s}=1π232(s1)σs1Γ(s/2)Γ(12k+s1)/Γ(12k)

and the distribution of Z is:

fZ(y)=12πicic+iysM{fZ(x)|s}ds

which looks to me (after a change of variables to eliminate the 232(s1) term) as at least a H-function

what is still left is the puzzle to express this inverse Mellin transform as a G function. The occurrence of both s and s/2 complicates this. In the separate case for a product of only Gaussian distributed variables the s/2 could be transformed into s by substituting the variable x=w2. But because of the terms of the chi-square distribution this does not work anymore. Maybe this is the reason why nobody has provided a solution for this case.


1
... which yields ...?
wolfies

it gives the antiderivative of the term in the integral that is to be solved according to the question
Sextus Empiricus

It is unclear what progress this analysis represents. Do you obtain a solution or not?
whuber

Finding the coefficients of the polynomial p(y) (which closes the solution) is a tedious, but straightforward, task which I left open. I will soon enter some examples for some k.
Sextus Empiricus
당사 사이트를 사용함과 동시에 당사의 쿠키 정책개인정보 보호정책을 읽고 이해하였음을 인정하는 것으로 간주합니다.
Licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required.